From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 8/8] cgroup: Add documentation for cgroup namespaces
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:09:53 -0600
Message-ID: <87fvbm2nni.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
References: <87lhlgpyxk.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
	<CAGr1F2HSi_D07r2c5CKOsjSR1+58k9G2MrtACsd+HV6XKvJ7cA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54AB2992.6060707@nod.at>
	<CAGr1F2EGOUSEd3-G4PS0mq=9kU1nWG4CwHUOQaNUATepc11_Sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<54ACFC38.5070007@nod.at> <87fvbmir9q.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
	<20150107193059.GA1857@mail.hallyn.com>
	<87bnma6xwv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
	<20150107224430.GA28414@htj.dyndns.org>
	<878uhe42km.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
	<20150107230615.GA28630@htj.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150107230615.GA28630-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> (Tejun Heo's message of
	"Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:06:15 -0500")
Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org>, Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Linux Containers <containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>, cgroups mailinglist <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:02:17PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ignoring namespace details for a moment. The following should be
>> possible with a unified hierarchy.  If it is not it is a show stopper
>> of a regression.
>
> The -o SUBSYS option doesn't exist.  Jesus, at least get yourself
> familiar with the basics before claiming random stuff.

Not random and I am familiar thank you very much.

I may have mistyped the manual command line configuration for specifying
which controllers appear on a mount point does not alter my point.

The old options to enable selecting controllers need to continue and
need to continue to work with a unified hierarchy.

Anything else is a gratuitious regression.

Eric