From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usercopy: Avoid soft lockups in test_check_nonzero_user() Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:23:27 +1100 Message-ID: <87sgnk5heo.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <20191011022447.24249-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <20191016122732.13467-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <20191016130319.vcc2mqac3ta5jjat@wittgenstein> <871rvctkof.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20191017060938.p4tmr5ruv6frgse4@wittgenstein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20191017060938.p4tmr5ruv6frgse4@wittgenstein> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Brauner Cc: cyphar@cyphar.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, christian@brauner.io, keescook@chromium.org, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Christian Brauner writes: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:00:48AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Christian Brauner writes: >> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:27:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> >> On a machine with a 64K PAGE_SIZE, the nested for loops in >> >> test_check_nonzero_user() can lead to soft lockups, eg: >> >> >> >> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [modprobe:611] >> >> Modules linked in: test_user_copy(+) vmx_crypto gf128mul crc32c_vpmsum virtio_balloon ip_tables x_tables autofs4 >> >> CPU: 4 PID: 611 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G L 5.4.0-rc1-gcc-8.2.0-00001-gf5a1a536fa14-dirty #1151 >> >> ... >> >> NIP __might_sleep+0x20/0xc0 >> >> LR __might_fault+0x40/0x60 >> >> Call Trace: >> >> check_zeroed_user+0x12c/0x200 >> >> test_user_copy_init+0x67c/0x1210 [test_user_copy] >> >> do_one_initcall+0x60/0x340 >> >> do_init_module+0x7c/0x2f0 >> >> load_module+0x2d94/0x30e0 >> >> __do_sys_finit_module+0xc8/0x150 >> >> system_call+0x5c/0x68 >> >> >> >> Even with a 4K PAGE_SIZE the test takes multiple seconds. Instead >> >> tweak it to only scan a 1024 byte region, but make it cross the >> >> page boundary. >> >> >> >> Fixes: f5a1a536fa14 ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper") >> >> Suggested-by: Aleksa Sarai >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman >> > >> > With Aleksa's Reviewed-by I've picked this up: >> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git/log/?h=copy_struct_from_user >> >> Thanks. Are you planning to send that to Linus for v5.4 or v5.5 ? > > This looks like a pretty straight bugfix to me since it's clearly > causing an issue for you on power so v5.4-rc4 is what I'd aim for. I > just want it to be in linux-next until tomorrow. I see it in mainine now, thanks! cheers