From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3B7C001DC for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231309AbjGaRSc (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2023 13:18:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232690AbjGaRSO (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2023 13:18:14 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F0EC3C2F; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:16:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1690823790; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GfWIocfTZiQHj6G3Mhtqo2RpmiVraR74yBaysrJkTOs=; b=4Hjb5UWSWPhvFnRfqwvguW8HYeyWkLb7/CcmdubaY+th+qcieNv/eekrVnssRfjQPfbopO MCG5+XcndAu+g5VCLp4VLcX7m4Pg6yY19/v3DWNMhBTvGXrJ/fjlmZthAoABcgYZf9ul7P YBDOPDek7DGarO2sm+ZT/XG472+hRojiXr5OYeJDKi7vKgyMtwUQIE9h5CqTrIduTtpEBt dgepI2gk+xGg1zDaob6+ScqygSC1YkRAEL7IhSAKe0NvkAmdDsVltkgAyXkhHrKDpAgkPR xl5LmhbdUA7aU902SGN3jg32VOixRxLSNCrKzptn8aMblO3LKm+bmXyjPDqzRw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1690823790; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GfWIocfTZiQHj6G3Mhtqo2RpmiVraR74yBaysrJkTOs=; b=AbsubkRPktsSbvKN5/0NyM/XHjXjQpjPByPzQkNSecLckXI9QGcekkY2CpduxxaB/oL8V3 SF5GOLvUwdqXhvAw== To: Peter Zijlstra , axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, andrealmeid@igalia.com, Andrew Morton , urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, lstoakes@gmail.com, Arnd Bergmann , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, malteskarupke@web.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] futex: Extend the FUTEX2 flags In-Reply-To: <87edkonjrk.ffs@tglx> References: <20230721102237.268073801@infradead.org> <20230721105743.819362688@infradead.org> <87edkonjrk.ffs@tglx> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 19:16:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87v8e0m26q.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 31 2023 at 18:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21 2023 at 12:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> -#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_32 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE) >> +#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_64 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE) >> >> /** >> * futex_parse_waitv - Parse a waitv array from userspace >> @@ -207,7 +207,12 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute >> if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_MASK) || aux.__reserved) >> return -EINVAL; > > With the above aux.flags with FUTEX2_32 set will result in -EINVAL. I > don't think that's intentional. Also if you allow 64bit wide futexes, how is that supposed to work with the existing code, which clearly expects a 32bit uval throughout the place? Thanks, tglx