linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Detecting the availability of VSYSCALL
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:15:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9wty9v4.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)

We're trying to create portable binaries which use VSYSCALL on older
kernels (to avoid performance regressions), but gracefully degrade to
full system calls on kernels which do not have VSYSCALL support compiled
in (or disabled at boot).

For technical reasons, we cannot use vDSO fallback.  Trying vDSO first
and only then use VSYSCALL is the way this has been tackled in the past,
which is why this userspace ABI breakage goes generally unnoticed.  But
we don't have a dynamic linker in our scenario.

Is there any reliable way to detect that VSYSCALL is unavailable,
without resorting to parsing /proc/self/maps or opening file
descriptors?

Should we try mapping something at the magic address (without MAP_FIXED)
and see if we get back a different address?  Something in the auxiliary
vector would work for us, too, but nothing seems to exists there
unfortunately.

Thanks,
Florian

             reply	other threads:[~2019-06-25 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-25 15:15 Florian Weimer [this message]
2019-06-25 16:30 ` Detecting the availability of VSYSCALL Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-25 16:38   ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-25 20:11     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-25 20:47       ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-25 21:49         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-26 12:12           ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-26 14:15             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-26 15:00               ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-26 15:21                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-26 15:36                   ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-26 16:24                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-26 16:45                       ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-26 16:52                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-26 17:04                           ` Florian Weimer
2019-06-26 17:14                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-25 20:08 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-25 20:13   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v9wty9v4.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).