From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Official Linux system wrapper library? Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:07:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87va4zaeai.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> References: <877ehjx447.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <875zx2vhpd.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20181113193859.GJ3505@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> <5853c297-9d84-86e5-dede-aa2957562c6b@arm.com> <1C1B38FC-1266-4A91-B8F6-20A0C49ED1E2@amacapital.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1C1B38FC-1266-4A91-B8F6-20A0C49ED1E2@amacapital.net> (Andy Lutomirski's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:46:47 -0800") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Szabolcs Nagy , Dave P Martin , Daniel Colascione , nd , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , linux-kernel , Joel Fernandes , Linux API , Willy Tarreau , Vlastimil Babka , Carlos O'Donell , "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org * Andy Lutomirski: > Thread cancellation is a big mess, and we only really need to support > it because on legacy code. The whole mechanism should IMO be > considered extremely deprecated. The part regarding legacy code is not true: people write new code using it all the time. It's true that this feature is difficult to use, and it is often employed in cases where it is not needed or counterproductive. However, there are cases where code becomes simpler. Thanks, Florian