linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ericvh@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net,
	hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:56:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wonuua4t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C65D3222-723F-4C0B-AF02-38488C302E84@amacapital.net> (Andy Lutomirski's message of "Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:38:10 -0700")

* Andy Lutomirski:

>> On Dec 27, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>> 
>> We have a bit of an interesting problem with respect to the d_off
>> field in struct dirent.
>> 
>> When running a 64-bit kernel on certain file systems, notably ext4,
>> this field uses the full 63 bits even for small directories (strace -v
>> output, wrapped here for readability):
>> 
>> getdents(3, [
>>  {d_ino=1494304, d_off=3901177228673045825, d_reclen=40,
>> d_name="authorized_keys", d_type=DT_REG},
>>  {d_ino=1494277, d_off=7491915799041650922, d_reclen=24, d_name=".",
>> d_type=DT_DIR},
>>  {d_ino=1314655, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_reclen=24,
>> d_name="..", d_type=DT_DIR}
>> ], 32768) = 88
>> 
>> When running in 32-bit compat mode, this value is somehow truncated to
>> 31 bits, for both the getdents and the getdents64 (!) system call (at
>> least on i386).
>
> I imagine you’re encountering this bug:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/859

It's definitely in this area.  However, the original collision problem
with 32-bit hashes is also real, so I can see the desire to use more
bits.

> Presumably the right fix involves modifying the relevant VFS file
> operations to indicate the relevant ABI to the implementations.

Not sure.  How does NFS solve this problem when access happens from a
32-bit process and the rest (client kernel, transport, server kernel)
is 64-bit all the way?

> I would guess that 9p is triggering the “not really in the syscall you
> think you’re in” issue.

I think the issue is more like the networking case for 9p.  In this
scenario, the server shouldn't have to care whether the client process
is in 32-bit mode or 64-bit mode.  But maybe the only solution is to
pass through some sort of flag, as Peter Maydell has just suggested.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-27 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-27 17:18 d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-27 17:56   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-12-27 17:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2018-12-28  0:23   ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-28 11:18     ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-28 23:16       ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-29  0:12         ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-29  1:54           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-29 16:49             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-30 13:59               ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-29  2:11       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29  2:37         ` Dominique Martinet
2018-12-29  3:14           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29  4:04             ` [V9fs-developer] " Dominique Martinet
2018-12-27 17:58 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-27 18:09   ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 11:53     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28 11:56       ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:01         ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:21           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-31 17:03       ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-02 13:16         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28  2:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-28  7:38   ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 15:26 ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wonuua4t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
    --to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).