From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: Official Linux system wrapper library? Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:03:50 -0500 Message-ID: <94ee3c86-781f-e865-8b7a-aa6ebb9a2609@redhat.com> References: <20181110192027.GA29892@kroah.com> <6a415f31-2bce-72fa-2ff0-5cbbd572347b@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6a415f31-2bce-72fa-2ff0-5cbbd572347b@suse.cz> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vlastimil Babka , Greg KH , Daniel Colascione Cc: linux-kernel , Joel Fernandes , Linux API , Adhemerval Zanella List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/18 2:58 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 11/10/18 8:20 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:52:06AM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote: >>> Now that glibc is basically not adding any new system call wrappers, >> >> Why are they not doing that anymore? > > FYI just noticed there's a topic relevant to this in LPC Toolchain MC: > > https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/2/contributions/149/ Yes, and Adhemerval put it there on purpose to continue the discussion between glibc developers and kernel developers. Florian Weimer and I have both provided input to that talk, so if something comes out of the talk and you want to talk more, please just reach out. I hope that kernel developers interested in this topic will attend and discuss the various ways forward on certain interesting topics :-) -- Cheers, Carlos.