linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@google.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
	 songmuchun@bytedance.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
	peterx@redhat.com,  mknyszek@google.com, minchan@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/madvise: add MADV_F_COLLAPSE_LIGHT to process_madvise()
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:26:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAa6QmRLfwhyh66bVVakp__Rkzpkt3zq2kAe9F-KN5sdFdqLAg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1f24=7fKU-+xRSOhrJrZ56=YoVfnkONZwNOJRS4yY4SzhANA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 6:35 AM Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Zach,
>
> What do you think about the semantic?

Hey Lance,

Sorry for the late reply.

I can see both sides of the argument; though I would argue that
"non-blocking" is equally as vague in this context. E.g. we'll "block" on
acquiring a number of different locks along the collapse path.

If you really want to talk about not entering direct reclaim /
compaction, then keeping with the sys/kernel/vm/thp notion of "defrag"
would be better, IMO. I don't feel that strongly about it though.

But I see you've provided some more use cases in another mail, so let
me pick up my thoughts over there.

Best,
Zach



> Thanks,
> Lance
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:14 PM Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 9:50 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat 20-01-24 10:09:32, Lance Yang wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Hey Michal,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your suggestion!
> > > >
> > > > It seems that the implementation should try but not too hard aligns well
> > > > with my desired behavior.
> > >
> > > The problem I have with this semantic is that it is really hard to
> > > define and then stick with. Our implementation might change over time
> > > and what somebody considers good ATM might turn int "trying harder than
> > > I wanted" later on.
> > >
> > > > Non-blocking in general is also a great idea.
> > > > Perhaps in the future, we can add a MADV_F_COLLAPSE_NOBLOCK
> > > > flag for scenarios where latency is extremely critical.
> > >
> > > Non blocking semantic is much easier to define and maintain. The actual
> > > allocation/compaction implementation might change as well over time but
> > > the userspace at least knows that the request will not block waiting for
> > > any required resources.
> >
> > I appreciate your insights!
> >
> > It makes sense that a non-blocking semantic is easier to define and maintain,
> > providing userspace with the certainty that requests won’t be blocked.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lance
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michal Hocko
> > > SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240118120347.61817-1-ioworker0@gmail.com>
2024-01-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/madvise: add MADV_F_COLLAPSE_LIGHT to process_madvise() Michal Hocko
     [not found] ` <ZakqQyL9t2ffNUIf@tiehlicka>
2024-01-18 13:43   ` Michal Hocko
2024-01-18 14:58     ` Zach O'Keefe
2024-01-18 19:00       ` Yang Shi
2024-01-19  2:37         ` Lance Yang
2024-01-19  1:46       ` Lance Yang
     [not found]   ` <CAK1f24k+=Sskotbct+yGxpDKNv=qyXPkww5i2kaqfzwaUVO_GQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <ZapwWuVTIDeI3W8A@tiehlicka>
     [not found]       ` <CAK1f24m9oxciHsAht4-cCWo_NT7x+bkoXUO2HOwgMCr0OnwpcA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <Za5yvjZWVyYjgyfh@tiehlicka>
     [not found]           ` <CAK1f24n+pTw=7atKGAbgBh8qKOTBPq-BEV7ZkLcgN3P0n3h3ug@mail.gmail.com>
2024-01-22 14:34             ` Lance Yang
2024-01-26 23:26               ` Zach O'Keefe [this message]
2024-01-27  8:06                 ` Lance Yang
2024-01-21  3:12 ` Lance Yang
2024-01-26  6:16   ` Lance Yang
2024-01-26 10:15     ` Lance Yang
2024-01-26 12:52       ` Lance Yang
2024-01-26 23:46         ` Zach O'Keefe
2024-01-27  8:03           ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAa6QmRLfwhyh66bVVakp__Rkzpkt3zq2kAe9F-KN5sdFdqLAg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=zokeefe@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mknyszek@google.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).