From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: statx(2) API and documentation
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 22:21:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguEriFyL4cpB1ZmoHi_03ouiGgMxFE0u1iZSriDa5bCjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4893.1539878663@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:04 PM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to implement statx for fuse and ran into the following issues:
>>
>> - Need a STATX_ATTRIBUTES bit, so that userspace can explicitly ask
>> for stx_attribute; otherwise if querying has non-zero cost, then
>> filesystem cannot do it without regressing performance.
>
> Okay, though the way your patch implements it makes it superfluous. I presume
> you have further patches that will actually make use of it from the fuse side?
Being worked on, yes.
>
>> - STATX_ALL definition is unclear, can this change, or is it fixed?
>> If it's the former, than that's a backward compatibility nightmare.
>> If it's the latter, then what's the point?
>
> It's the set of supported attributes known by the headers, and such can
> only be added to over time. But yes, it's probably unnecessary. Asking
> fsinfo() will be a better way of doing things.
>
>> - STATX_ATIME is cleared from stx_mask on SB_RDONLY,
>
> Ummm... Where? It's cleared on IS_NOATIME() in generic_fillattr(). I made
> the assumption that IS_NOATIME() == false indicates that there isn't an atime
> to be had.
Look at IS_NOATIME definition in <linux/fs.h>
You probably wanted inode->i_sb->s_flags & SB_NOATIME instead.
>> and on NFS it is also cleared on MNT_NOATIME, but not on MNT_RDONLY. We
>> need some sort of guideline in the documentation about what constitutes
>> "unsupported": does atime become unsupported because filesystem is remounted
>> r/o? If so, why isn't this case handled consistently in the VFS and
>> filesystems?
>
> STATX_ATIME should mean there is an actual atime from the "medium" in
> stx_atime, rather than something made up by the filesystem driver; it doesn't
> necessarily promise that this will be updated.
In this case generic_fillattr() and nfs_getattr() are simply buggy.
>
> There can still be an atime if the medium is read-only.
>
> atime is even more complicated with MNT_NOATIME or MNT_RDONLY because that
> doesn't stop the atime from actually being updated through another mountpoint
> on the same system.
>
> Note that stx_atime should always contain something that can be used directly
> to fill in st_atime if emulating stat() - even if STATX_ATIME is cleared.
>
>> - What about fields that are not cached when statx() is called with
>> AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC? E.g. stx_btime is supported by the filesystem,
>> but getting it requires a roundtrip to the server.
>
> Not necessarily. It's not cached in *struct inode*, but that doesn't mean
> that the filesystem can't cache it elsewhere.
>
>> Requesting STATX_BTIME in the mask and adding AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC to the
>> flags means the filesystem has to decide which it will honor. My feeling is
>> that it should honor AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC and clear STATX_BTIME in stx_mask.
>> Documentation has no word about this case.
>
> From the manpage:
>
> AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC
> Don't synchronize anything, but rather just take whatever the
> system has cached if possible. ...
>
> Note the "if possible". If it's not possible, you still need to go get it if
> they explicitly asked for it.
Okay.
Thanks,
Miklos
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-17 18:24 statx(2) API and documentation Miklos Szeredi
2018-10-17 18:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2018-10-17 19:04 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-10-17 20:22 ` Andreas Dilger
2018-10-17 22:22 ` Florian Weimer
2018-10-18 7:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-10-18 7:39 ` Florian Weimer
2018-10-18 7:42 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-10-18 7:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-10-17 22:15 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-18 7:41 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-18 7:49 ` Florian Weimer
2018-10-18 16:04 ` David Howells
2018-10-18 20:21 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJfpeguEriFyL4cpB1ZmoHi_03ouiGgMxFE0u1iZSriDa5bCjw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).