From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/14] x86/vdso: Insert endbr32/endbr64 to vDSO Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:26:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20190606200926.4029-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20190606200926.4029-10-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190606200926.4029-10-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yu-cheng Yu Cc: X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux-MM , linux-arch , Linux API , Arnd Bergmann , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 1:17 PM Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > From: "H.J. Lu" > > When Intel indirect branch tracking is enabled, functions in vDSO which > may be called indirectly must have endbr32 or endbr64 as the first > instruction. Compiler must support -fcf-protection=branch so that it > can be used to compile vDSO. Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski > > Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu You're still missing your Signed-off-by.