From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Tull Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/21] fpga: add Intel FPGA DFL PCIe device Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:29:34 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1511764948-20972-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <1511764948-20972-9-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <20171128031519.GA25705@hao-dev> <20171205033330.GA19730@hao-dev> <20171206053015.GA19023@hao-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Laight Cc: Wu Hao , "mdf-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "linux-fpga-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "luwei.kang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "yi.z.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Tim Whisonant , Enno Luebbers , Shiva Rao , Christopher Rauer , Xiao Guangrong List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, David Laight wrote: > From: Wu Hao >> Sent: 06 December 2017 05:30 > ... >> > Regarding file names, it seems like the files added to drivers/fpga >> > could be uniformly named dfl-*.[ch]. Some are fpga-dfl-*.[ch] while >> > other are currently dfl-*.[ch] currently. > > They don't even want to do into a drivers/fgpa directory. > Maybe drivers/dfl or drivers/dfl/intel It's plugged into the fpga framework in drivers/fpga. This patchset also handles reprogramming the fpga, not just the dfl style enumeration. But your points about this being not just for FPGA are interesting to me. Do you have a use for this that isn't FPGA-centric? Alan > > David >