From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:24:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <551ABE00.9050003@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <551ABE00.9050003-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Shuah Khan , Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Davidlohr Bueso , KOSAKI Motohiro , greg Kroah-Hartman , fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Michael Ellerman List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" wrote: >Hi Daren, > >On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> Hi Shuah, >> >> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into >>kselftest. >> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and >>stress may >> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand. >> >> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others >>that would >> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile >>and not >> creating new typedefs. >> >> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your >>convenience >> as well. > >Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC. >Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the >4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2. OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate and respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge these. Which do you prefer? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center