From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph-qD8j1LwMmJjtCj0u4l0SBw@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org,
libc-alpha-9JcytcrH/bA+uJoB2kUjGw@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: MIPS MSA sigcontext changes in 3.15
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:03:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1406171447030.23412@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
Reviewing changes in Linux 3.15 for anything for which glibc changes would
be appropriate, I don't see how the MSA sigcontext changes are supposed to
work with existing binaries.
The sigcontext structure isn't used on its own - it's part of ucontext,
which is passed to signal handlers, and it's not at the end of ucontext,
but followed by the signal mask. So existing binaries will expect the
signal mask at a particular offset in the ucontext. As far as I can see,
extending sigcontext requires a new sigaction flag that could be used to
opt in, for a particular signal handler, to receiving the new-layout
ucontext (so new symbol versions of sigaction in glibc could then pass
that flag to the kernel, but existing binaries would continue to get
old-layout ucontext from the kernel), or else putting the new data at the
end of ucontext rather than in the main sigcontext structure (though I
don't know if that would have other issues).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph-qD8j1LwMmJjtCj0u4l0SBw@public.gmane.org
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 15:03 Joseph S. Myers [this message]
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.1406171447030.23412-9YEB1lltEqivcGRMvF24k2I39yigxGEX@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-17 15:44 ` MIPS MSA sigcontext changes in 3.15 Joseph S. Myers
2014-06-17 16:25 ` Paul Burton
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.1406171539240.23412-9YEB1lltEqivcGRMvF24k2I39yigxGEX@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-17 16:32 ` Matthew Fortune
2014-06-17 18:14 ` Paul Burton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1406171447030.23412@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph-qd8j1lwmmjjtcj0u4l0sbw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=libc-alpha-9JcytcrH/bA+uJoB2kUjGw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).