From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85ABC46467 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229589AbiKXLzb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:55:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33704 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229661AbiKXLz3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:55:29 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6EBC5B62; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:55:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1669290928; x=1700826928; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=55nH4LmzDK+5WNB9MoXsKRknvVrM2IQDWXw3Al5UU80=; b=EDy6qYR8OiqLFY9zK45oL63khFfMVHFVedyC8cO4xaHg3udrXdxyeSU8 xQSjz1mnID1Q+wNM3flz+a9zk88mUh5AbRPCKaiUbJ0on0Ly1Y7YHlEsn IyhBMbGj2MW0eaMmmL1f5HRQrWjvV0BZ1ATDNrHLDQf//H0TQu4blVmQy XGS8N3UGxbigQNr/UFk7C9F4DZiAdJLCdxknozEXVNb+2y8Sj6/T+XCpP 5YnRIruMCKnwRccuUvbGkVFe9ypLrzBoXFO0YmUuS9g1XbgXrn8kLHs40 wiUt1QWhRWIU4BR2Mz8S9yP94mmEGBWIyCeQWt6Y0hkau1sA0u4LsEp+R g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,190,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="124940786" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 24 Nov 2022 04:55:27 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 04:55:23 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 04:55:20 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:55:01 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Samuel Ortiz CC: "Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Albert Ou , Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , , , , , Michael Kerrisk , , Jiatai He , Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: uapi: add HWCAP for Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Patch #1 is definitely needed regardless of which interface we pick for > exposing the ISA strings to userspace. I took another look at #1, and I feel more confused about what constitutes canonical order than I did before! If you know better than I, and you probably do since you're interested in these 6 month old patches, some insight would be appreciated! Thanks, Conor.