linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_STRICT memory policy
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:22:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWbrr2vgLb32JZQ3@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adc63bf3-b8b6-c705-805d-a84633a7f728@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed 13-10-21 18:40:26, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 10/13/21 18:37, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 13-10-21 18:28:40, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > On 10/13/21 18:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > I am still not sure the semantic makes sense though. Why should
> > > > the lowest node in the nodemask have any special meaning? What if it is
> > > > a node with a higher number that somebody preferes to start with?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > That is true. I haven't been able to find an easy way to specify the
> > > preferred node other than expressing it as first node in the node mask. Yes,
> > > it limits the usage of the policy. Any alternate suggestion?
> > 
> > set_mempolicy is indeed not very suitable for something you are looking
> > for. Could you be more specific why the initial node is so important?
> > Is this because you want to allocate from a cpu less node first before
> > falling back to others?
> > 
> 
> One of the reason is that the thread that is faulting in pages first is not
> the one that is going to operate on this page long term. Application wants
> to hint the allocation node for the same reason they use MPOL_PREFERRED now.

Why cannot you move the faulting thread to a numa node of the preference
during the faulting and them move it out if that is really necessary?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20211013094539.962357-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
2021-10-13 10:42 ` [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_STRICT memory policy Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 10:48   ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 12:35     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 12:50       ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 12:58         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 13:07           ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:10             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:22               ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-10-13 13:57           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:26             ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWbrr2vgLb32JZQ3@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).