Re: Regression of madvise(MADV_COLD) on shmem?

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>]

On Mon 07-03-22 13:10:08, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 05-03-22 02:17:37, Yu Zhao wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> > index bcf3ac288b56..7fd99f037ca7 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -563,7 +559,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page
> > *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
> > 
> >  static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
> >  {
> > -       if (PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> > +       if (!PageUnevictable(page)) {
> >                 int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
> > 
> >                 del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
> > @@ -677,7 +673,7 @@ void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page)
> >   */
> >  void deactivate_page(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -       if (PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> > +       if (PageLRU(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> >                 struct pagevec *pvec;
> > 
> >                 local_lock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
> > 
> > I'll leave it to Minchan to decide whether this is worth fixing,
> > together with this one:
> 
> There doesn't seem to be any dependency on the PageActive anymore. I do
> remember we have relied on the PageActive to move from the active list
> to the inactive. This is not the case anymore but I am wondering whether
> above is really sufficient. If you are deactivating an inactive page
> then I would expect you want to move that page in the LRU as well. In
> other words don't you want
> 	if (page_active)
> 		add_page_to_lru_list
> 	else
> 		add_page_to_lru_list_tail

Do you plan to send an official patch?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs