From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v9] reclaim file-backed pages given POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:38:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7WmjagtARpTA781@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z7REHrJ3ImdrF476@infradead.org>
On 02/18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This still has a file system sysfs HACK, you're still not Ccing the
> right list, etc.
>
> Can you pleae at least try to get it right?
I was modifying the patch having 1) declaring a static global list, 2) adding
some fields to superblock and inode structures to keep the given range in the
inode through fadvise, 3) adding hooks in evict_inode to handle the list, 4)
exploring which sysfs entry in MM to reclaim them explicitly.
But, I stopped at some point, as it looks not good at all. Moreover, I started
to be questioning why not just doing in F2FS back, given sementically I didn't
change anything on general behavior of fadvise(POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE), IIUC, which
moves pages back to LRU. In addiiton to that, I'd like to keep the range hint in
a filesystem and provide a sysfs entry to manage the hints additionally.
In addition, I don't think there's rule that filesystem cannot reclaim file-back
pages, as it just uses the exported symbol that all filesystems are using in
various different purpose. Hence, I don't get the point which is wrong.
Thanks,
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 02:31:55AM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch series does not add new API, but implements POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE where
> > it keeps the page ranges in the f2fs superblock and add a way for users to
> > reclaim the pages manually.
> >
> > Change log from v8:
> > - remove new APIs, but use fadvise(POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE)
> >
> > Jaegeuk Kim (2):
> > f2fs: keep POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE ranges
> > f2fs: add a sysfs entry to reclaim POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE pages
> >
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 7 ++
> > fs/f2fs/debug.c | 3 +
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 14 +++-
> > fs/f2fs/file.c | 60 +++++++++++++++--
> > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 14 ++++
> > fs/f2fs/shrinker.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 1 +
> > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++
> > 8 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
> >
> >
> ---end quoted text---
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250212023518.897942-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
2025-02-18 8:26 ` [PATCH 0/2 v9] reclaim file-backed pages given POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-19 9:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7WmjagtARpTA781@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).