From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tj@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/11] mm/mempolicy: modify get_mempolicy call stack to take a task argument
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:49:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWX94KO-XYLuikHd@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWX1U1gCTXC+lFXn@memverge.com>
[restoring the CC list as I believe this was not meant to be a private
response]
On Tue 28-11-23 09:12:35, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:07:28PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 22-11-23 16:11:53, Gregory Price wrote:
> > [...]
> > > @@ -928,7 +929,16 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask,
> > > * vma/shared policy at addr is NULL. We
> > > * want to return MPOL_DEFAULT in this case.
> > > */
> > > - mm = current->mm;
> > > + if (task == current) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * original behavior allows a kernel task changing its
> > > + * own policy to avoid the condition in get_task_mm,
> > > + * so we'll directly access
> > > + */
> > > + mm = task->mm;
> > > + mmget(mm);
> >
> > Do we actually have any kernel thread that would call this? Does it
> > actually make sense to support?
> >
>
> This was changed in the upcoming v2 by using the pidfd interface for
> referencing both the task and the mm, so this code is a bit dead.
OK, that is the right thing to do IMHO. Allowing modifications on memory
policies on borrowed mms sounds rather weird and if we do not have any
actual usecases that would require that support then I would rather not
open that possibility at all.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 21:11 [RFC PATCH 00/11] mm/mempolicy: Make task->mempolicy externally modifiable via syscall and procfs Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] mm/mempolicy: refactor do_set_mempolicy for code re-use Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] mm/mempolicy: swap cond reference counting logic in do_get_mempolicy Gregory Price
2023-11-28 14:07 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <ZWX0ytAwmOdooHdZ@memverge.com>
2023-11-28 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] mm/mempolicy: refactor set_mempolicy stack to take a task argument Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] mm/mempolicy: modify get_mempolicy call " Gregory Price
2023-11-28 14:07 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <ZWX1U1gCTXC+lFXn@memverge.com>
2023-11-28 14:49 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] mm/mempolicy: modify set_mempolicy_home_node " Gregory Price
2023-11-28 14:07 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-28 14:14 ` Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] mm/mempolicy: modify do_mbind to operate on task argument instead of current Gregory Price
2023-11-28 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-28 14:51 ` Gregory Price
2023-11-28 18:08 ` Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] mm/mempolicy: add task mempolicy syscall variants Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] mm/mempolicy: export replace_mempolicy for use by procfs Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] mm/mempolicy: build mpol_parse_str unconditionally Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] mm/mempolicy: mpol_parse_str should ignore trailing characters in nodelist Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:12 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] fs/proc: Add mempolicy attribute to allow read/write of task mempolicy Gregory Price
2023-11-22 21:33 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] mm/mempolicy: Make task->mempolicy externally modifiable via syscall and procfs Andrew Morton
2023-11-22 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2023-11-22 22:24 ` Gregory Price
2023-11-27 15:29 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-27 16:14 ` Gregory Price
2023-11-28 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-28 13:15 ` Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWX94KO-XYLuikHd@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).