From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: "olsajiri@gmail.com" <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
"songliubraving@fb.com" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"mhiramat@kernel.org" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"andrii@kernel.org" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"yhs@fb.com" <yhs@fb.com>, "oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-man@vger.kernel.org" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 2/7] uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 16:01:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjVs4bxi7CpWhtEQ@debug.ba.rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c143c648e2eff6c4d4b5e4700d1a8fbcc0f8cbc.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 07:38:18PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
>+Some more shadow stack folks from other archs. We are discussing how uretprobes
>work with shadow stack.
>
>Context:
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZjU4ganRF1Cbiug6@krava/
Thanks Rick.
Yeah I didn't give enough attention to uprobes either.
Although now that I think for RISC-V shadow stack, it shouldn't be an issue.
On RISC-V return addresses don't get pushed as part of call instruction.
There is a distinct instruction "shadow stack push of return address" in prolog.
Similarly in epilog there is distinct instruction "shadow stack pop and check with
link register".
On RISC-V, uretprobe would install a uprobe on function start and when it's hit.
It'll replace pt_regs->ra = trampoline_handler. As function will resume, trampoline
addr will get pushed and popped. Although trampoline_handler would have to be enlightened
to eventually return to original return site.
>
>On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 21:18 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> hack below seems to fix it for the current uprobe setup,
>> we need similar fix for the uretprobe syscall trampoline setup
>
>It seems like a reasonable direction.
>
>Security-wise, applications cannot do this on themselves, or it is an otherwise
>privileged thing right?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 12:23 [PATCHv4 bpf-next 0/7] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 1/7] uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 2/7] uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe Jiri Olsa
2024-05-03 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-03 13:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-03 15:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-03 19:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-03 19:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-03 20:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-03 20:35 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-05-06 10:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-03 23:01 ` Deepak Gupta [this message]
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 3/7] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs integrity Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 4/7] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs changes Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 5/7] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 16:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe compat test Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 16:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-05-02 12:23 ` [PATCHv4 7/7] man2: Add uretprobe syscall page Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 13:43 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-02 20:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-02 22:06 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-05-02 16:43 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 0/7] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Andrii Nakryiko
2024-05-02 20:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-03 18:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-05-03 20:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-07 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjVs4bxi7CpWhtEQ@debug.ba.rivosinc.com \
--to=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).