From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD70D3932FD; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776290548; cv=none; b=sqaLVihmJnbdyW+yTjnK1u8gg/cUU/GRkwA2de630l0h9lnZpd4qg47VWU47s9qwIvBCPjl2ZJZ1QMraYIrIjxoA8B53P5BBYw8f/l/FLg6aXkXk5sUw7yhaPUxa+TbqZE9VAn/fVohYcSrobWraDgu/4KENAwpjzzblfTIZ5jQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776290548; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eHdW8R6LaWTSjbq77BW1DvuiaGuL6ZDV4aigbLwLhpI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cm02cyO9IkTXzfCFcdy/uEqKfbccEq1ffwMnfuTu4KDeyppPmPUlHAEMa1ZgphSce/K1oqYTTQQC9W8LD2x0ewW3BFi09CsE+g95fWns9kzz/9FxZyhAXKcNWPOTonq/dJo7i37ZY/+095pXQSSd9ppKll+3SduvZD67ebKNCFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XoV9YXsY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XoV9YXsY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 773D5C2BCB3; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:02:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776290548; bh=eHdW8R6LaWTSjbq77BW1DvuiaGuL6ZDV4aigbLwLhpI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XoV9YXsYNN1CZkDb1byLNi8Jdbd5s38Km7seKFLW4DLj3vnRMIQOQsLhTidaONb7k h6lA5oaxu83UbcKwfOVzsb/k+YYXaI2es+iopGc2xVDzivpEy1IRExVTOUlPviLUKx LU2rshy6iMXQmvz2FxUOz5W4N6hUhSFRigxwqv7yr8ILO4n3QAJrU8uqLGDrGs4iyJ tN+j/zQ2h047VuVLzhzkpoaactyEXnC0jVAlS+WhivRekSM1mXKacK4qKEg5XZFmyQ +oJQIR8hkIg7IPb+BTQYL2/yLU/+owgjjQd15Si2Bo0xflVuMu1XWVbbL6Dh9dah18 PD0KpqchWh6qg== Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:02:26 +0000 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Akilesh Kailash , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: another way to set large folio by remembering inode number Message-ID: References: <20260409134538.3692605-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 04/15, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 04:44:04PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Please add the relevant mailing lists when adding new user interfaces. > > > > > > And I'm not sure hacks working around the proper large folio > > > implementation are something that should be merged upstream. > > > > Cc'ed linux-api and linux-fsdevel onto the patch thread with a proposal that > > I'm not sure it's acceptable or not. > > You haven't sent a proposal. This is a reply to a reply to a reply of a > patch. There's no justification for why f2fs is so special that it > needs this. What the hell is going on? You know this is not the way to > get code merged into Linux. I added two ideas in that email. Have you even tried to understand?