From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm, doc: cleanup and clarify munmap behavior for hugetlb memory Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Davide Libenzi , Luiz Capitulino , Shuah Khan , Andrea Arcangeli , Joern Engel , Jianguo Wu , Eric B Munson , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > munmap(2) of hugetlb memory requires a length that is hugepage aligned, > > otherwise it may fail. Add this to the documentation. > > Thanks for taking this on, David. But although munmap(2) is the one > Davide called out, it goes beyond that, doesn't it? To mprotect and > madvise and ... > Yes, good point, munmap(2) isn't special in this case, the alignment to the native page size of the platform should apply to madvise, mbind, mincore, mlock, mprotect, remap_file_pages, etc. I'd hesitate to compile any authoritative list on the behavior in Documentation/vm/hugetlbpage.txt since it would exclude future extensions, but I'll update it to be more inclusive of other mm syscalls rather than specify only munmap(2).