From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: rt-tester - move under selftests Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:54:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <5446BDC6.4040502@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5446BDC6.4040502-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Shuah Khan Cc: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Shuah Khan wrote: > Andrew/Ingo/Thomas, > > You are all on the signed-off list for rt-tester. I have been poking > around the source tree looking for existing test and came across rt-tester. > > What are your thoughts on rt-tester suitability to reside under > tools/testing/selftest and becoming part of kselftest target? > Would you like see it moved under the kselftest umbrella? Sure you can move it, but it is broken and needs a complete rewrite. So the proper solution is to remove it. I kept it there as a reminder to fix it, but obviously I never managed to do so. Thanks, tglx