From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:27:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: References: <20150223161625.GD25477@ubuntumail> <20150223164623.GB32181@mail.hallyn.com> <20150223181553.GE25477@ubuntumail> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150223181553.GE25477@ubuntumail> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Serge Hallyn Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , Aaron Jones , Ted Ts'o , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, "Andrew G. Morgan" , Mimi Zohar , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Markku Savela , Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Michael Kerrisk , Jonathan Corbet List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > So the cap was dropped from the cap perm set but it is still active > > in the ambient set? > > Right, and the legacy program doesn't know to check the new set. Does it have to? The ambient set could not show up in permitted.