From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 04/24] Restartable sequences: x86 32/64 architecture support Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:14:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20171114200414.2188-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20171114200414.2188-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171114200414.2188-5-mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Andrew Hunter , Andi Kleen , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , Steven Rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: Please fix the subject line: x86: Add support for restartable sequences or something like that. And for the actual rseq patches please come up with a proper short susbsytem prefix for restartable sequences. There is no point in occupying half of the subject space for a prefix. Other than that. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner