From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 for 4.15 08/24] Provide cpu_opv system call Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:09:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20171114200414.2188-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20171114200414.2188-9-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20171117001410.GG2482@two.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171117001410.GG2482-1g7Xle2YJi4/4alezvVtWx2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Andrew Hunter , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , Steven Rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Andi Kleen wrote: > My preference would be just to drop this new super ugly system call. > > It's also not just the ugliness, but the very large attack surface > that worries me here. > > As far as I know it is only needed to support single stepping, correct? I can't figure that out because the changelog describes only WHAT the patch does and not WHY. Useful, isn't it? > Then this whole mess would disappear. Agreed. That would be much appreciated. Thanks, tglx