From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND] Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:14:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20090226133339.875832967@linutronix.de> <20090227000352.7D32BFC339@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090227000352.7D32BFC339-nL1rrgvulkc2UH6IwYuUx0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Roland McGrath Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Linux API List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Roland, On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > I don't see any rationale for rt_tgsigqueueinfo and rt_sigqueueinfo to > differ in their treatment of si_pid/si_uid (whatever that is). It just > seems like common sense that they would match. > > Oleg and/or Sukadev have some patches floating around (maybe all in -mm?) > that relate to setting those. You mean having the same logic as we have in {t,tg,}kill syscalls for rt_sigqueueinfo as well ? Is there anything else which stands in the way of getting the rt_tgsigqueueinfo interface merged ? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html