From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] posix clock tuning Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Richard Cochran Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Richard Cochran wrote: > Recently on the lkml, we discussed how to allow adjustment of posix > clocks. I have tried to understand and implement the ideas expressed > in the various threads. Cc'ing the relevant maintainers to such discussions and patches might be helpful. Seems I need to do some archive digging. > If there is agreement on this approach, I will resubmit these two > patches as part of a longer series, including support for a new kind > of hardware clock, so you can see how it all fits together. But first, > I would like to concentrate on the new syscall itself. > > The patches are against a recent net-next tree. Please don't worry if > the syscall tables are not quite up to date. I can fix that later. How is this related to net-next ? Thanks, tglx