From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 02/10] bpf: Add eBPF program subtype and is_valid_subtype() verifier Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:46:37 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: References: <20170821000933.13024-1-mic@digikod.net> <20170821000933.13024-3-mic@digikod.net> <20170823024452.zvizovwfd7xjucsx@ast-mbp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: In-Reply-To: <20170823024452.zvizovwfd7xjucsx@ast-mbp> To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Andy Lutomirski , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Casey Schaufler , Daniel Borkmann , David Drysdale , "David S . Miller" , "Eric W . Biederman" , James Morris , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Garrett , Michael Kerrisk , Kees Cook , Paul Moore , Sargun Dhillon , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Shuah Khan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > more general question: what is the status of security/ bits? > I'm assuming they still need to be reviewed and explicitly acked by James, right? Yep, along with other core security developers where possible. -- James Morris