From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] /proc/pid/status: Add support for architecture
 specific output
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:38:40 +0800
Message-ID: <c9662fea-faaf-beb3-246a-c60dad6d7420@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190224044400.34975-1-aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904052129371.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CALCETrVhpqZiBe6zvK+z6HmD9AhK_O_O=2H=PYzBHid4C=SMYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVhpqZiBe6zvK+z6HmD9AhK_O_O=2H=PYzBHid4C=SMYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, aubrey.li@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

On 2019/4/8 1:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>>> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
>>> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
>>> specific information externally.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> This really lacks
>>
>> Cc: Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
>> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>
>> Cc'ed now.
>>
> 
> I certainly understand why you want to expose this info, but would it
> make more sense to instead add an arch_status file in /proc with
> architecture-specific info?  Or maybe an x86_status field for x86
> status, etc.
> 

I tried this, but no other architecture showed interest in arch_status
under /proc.

Thanks,
-Aubrey