From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
Cc: "Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i@zenithal.me>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, Jiatai He <jiatai2021@iscas.ac.cn>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: uapi: add HWCAP for Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 17:20:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9ae9644-5cd0-29c2-a25c-bb497dfcb1c8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3+mBAV8oxphjHcJ@vermeer>
On 24/11/2022 17:12, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> [You don't often get email from sameo@rivosinc.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:55:01AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>>
>>> Patch #1 is definitely needed regardless of which interface we pick for
>>> exposing the ISA strings to userspace.
>>
>> I took another look at #1, and I feel more confused about what
>> constitutes canonical order than I did before! If you know better than
>> I, and you probably do since you're interested in these 6 month old
>> patches, some insight would be appreciated!
>
> Assuming we don't go with hwcap, I dont think the order of the
> riscv_isa_ext_id enum matters that much?
The chief put it in canonical order so that's good enough for me!
>
> iiuc we're building the cpuinfo string from the riscv_isa_ext_data
> array, and I think the current code is incorrect:
>
> static struct riscv_isa_ext_data isa_ext_arr[] = {
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX),
> };
>
> zicbom and zihintpause should come before supervisor level extensions.
> I'm going to send a patch for that.
idk, Palmer explicitly re-ordered this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220920204518.10988-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
By my reading of the isa manual, what Palmer did is correct as
those are not "Additional Standard Extensions". /shrug
>
> And the Zb/Zk ones should come after the Zi ones, and before the
> supervisor level ones (The I category comes before the B or the K one).
This I agree with though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-12 18:44 [PATCH v3 0/3] RISC-V: Add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto HWCAP Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng
2022-06-12 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] RISC-V: add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto parsing from DT Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng
2022-11-24 9:19 ` Samuel Ortiz
2022-11-24 11:53 ` Conor Dooley
2022-06-12 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: uapi: add HWCAP for Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng
2022-11-24 9:30 ` Samuel Ortiz
2022-11-24 9:58 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-24 10:47 ` Samuel Ortiz
2022-11-24 11:55 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-24 17:12 ` Samuel Ortiz
2022-11-24 17:20 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-11-24 17:34 ` Samuel Ortiz
2022-11-24 17:54 ` Conor Dooley
2022-11-24 18:09 ` Samuel Ortiz
2022-06-12 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] RISC-V: HWCAP: parse Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto HWCAP from DT Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9ae9644-5cd0-29c2-a25c-bb497dfcb1c8@kernel.org \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=jiatai2021@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).