From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666A9C433E6 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3051B64F17 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234010AbhCMRK0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:10:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35438 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234071AbhCMRKH (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:10:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563E5C061574; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:10:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id j4-20020a05600c4104b029010c62bc1e20so16966134wmi.3; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:10:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uxXcx5tCWVJlzcshWXHiDgaPyurgvL5/J2tFChe0zBg=; b=lgAtaOsdhAi+Qaq0ZXhJ2RyjVzIA0NdwA81J/CeE/nDSCHejnq3mlfAGnCNvlBSiuM m8QS9KwANjL59/D0JMCuaOgEeruMzzcpyy9rSz177MUhiBCDviF+3aEDUM2gHMuoEjy3 iK5oMmo+rcGzXUAsvJRjKrN28CQbFOdGzFSg9psocKDwQ8yO1CUHMNt8UPsV26LFOO3L DI8zkATPjqON6uKDG+i2Ch3WxUFy2wbfSWgHBrL2Fa6eNauGoli5Maxsf+XHmQDMMgRo TdT4be9bRftf43D8qRJ8roWClk22dajSCu5U8TigzbZk2qAG/Agv8reDwTFtFlAL5vZI KbdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uxXcx5tCWVJlzcshWXHiDgaPyurgvL5/J2tFChe0zBg=; b=mTsS7VSTd99xMPxqhin+VBL2oVBXGicxpEO1aa4VkJbnjiLZnEKgoGgEu66GQfM5Eg U6fK4Tlo0GGI3p32E3v4WzqkxZ3IoNNCgrr+wwPSe4FV7BbO+CFDqd/WTyR9aCYNvGDf 14nWx/0bZQJaPJBOBUw6Kih2cHIEcQb9RmxHAb8yUrpswYbwCQjVaKDwSgmaBagqyGJ9 x/vqeMSeD2JBOrY7KfpplI6rL4eFb3nFjsd6plbMC3DIcqpiPlqLyaLzke3CLMIvuasM KV2Rz+dz8DeoxkEThsXhMg/TiLDDf+9e7BSTJZiEOMO1WPCbgSspXFgoslcUVzEDNnUU zyvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LG9/q/99gbrEeCwstG3Rp1Gd20AoKy1ToscUK8FPxO42pI7a6 2p67FukVLa9DQOY519kxQA1jY7HpbOZN8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzx5pXKZyc0H0ELXyqikd7atH4DO/6lXbTiNri/jZCpws6ukyPErnUKkKVIf4gI0gutocBhLA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c096:: with SMTP id r22mr18576100wmh.102.1615655406109; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([170.253.51.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm7481816wma.20.2021.03.13.09.10.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:10:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: epoll_wait.2: epoll_pwait2(2) prototype To: "Dmitry V. Levin" Cc: Willem de Bruijn , linux-man , Florian Weimer , Michael Kerrisk , linux-fsdevel , linux-api@vger.kernel.org References: <20210313170250.GA15968@altlinux.org> From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:10:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210313170250.GA15968@altlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hi Dmitry, On 3/13/21 6:02 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 05:48:08PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: >> Hi Willem, >> >> I checked that the prototype of the kernel epoll_pwait2() syscall is >> different from the one we recently merged; it has one more parameter >> 'size_t sigsetsize': [...] >> >> I'm could fix the prototype, but maybe there are more changes needed for >> the manual page. >> >> Would you mind fixing it? > > Looks like the 6th argument of epoll_pwait and epoll_pwait2 syscalls > is already described in "C library/kernel differences" subsection of > epoll_pwait2(2). Ahhh, I didn't see it, ok. That's in BUGS by mistake. I'll move it to NOTES, where it should be. Thanks, Alex -- Alejandro Colomar Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/