From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/27] x86/cet/shstk: Introduce WRUSS instruction Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:43:27 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20181011151523.27101-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20181011151523.27101-22-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181011151523.27101-22-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/18 8:15 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > @@ -1305,6 +1305,15 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, > error_code |= X86_PF_USER; > flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER; > } else { > + /* > + * WRUSS is a kernel instruction and but writes > + * to user shadow stack. When a fault occurs, > + * both X86_PF_USER and X86_PF_SHSTK are set. > + * Clear X86_PF_USER here. > + */ > + if ((error_code & (X86_PF_USER | X86_PF_SHSTK)) == > + (X86_PF_USER | X86_PF_SHSTK)) > + error_code &= ~X86_PF_USER; This hunk of code basically points out that the architecture of WRUSS is broken for Linux. The setting of X86_PF_USER for a ring-0 instruction really is a mis-feature of the architecture for us and we *undo* it in software which is unfortunate. Wish I would have caught this earlier. Andy, note that this is another case where hw_error_code and sw_error_code will diverge, unfortunately. Anyway, this is going to necessitate some comment updates in the page fault code. Yu-cheng, you are going to collide with some recent changes I made to the page fault code. Please be careful with the context when you do the merge and make sure that all the new comments stay correct.