From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:25:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190528101012.11402-1-chrubis@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190528101012.11402-1-chrubis@suse.cz> (Cyril Hrubis's message of "Tue, 28 May 2019 12:10:12 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: lkml , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Michal Simek , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mai 28 2019, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > I've tested the patch on i386. Before the patch calling bdflush() with > attempt to tune a variable returned 0 and after the patch the syscall > fails with EINVAL. Should be ENOSYS, doesn't it? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."