From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] fs: add a flag for per-operation O_DSYNC semantics Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:46:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Milosz Tanski's message of "Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:14:53 -0500") Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Milosz Tanski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, Mel Gorman , Volker Lendecke , Tejun Heo , Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Michael Kerrisk , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Milosz Tanski writes: > - if (type == READ && (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK)) > - return -EAGAIN; > + if (type == READ) { > + if (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK) > + return -EAGAIN; > + } else { > + if (flags & RWF_DSYNC) > + return -EINVAL; > + } Minor nit, but I'd rather read something that looks like this: if (type == READ && (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK)) return -EAGAIN; else if (type == WRITE && (flags & RWF_DSYNC)) return -EINVAL; I won't lose sleep over it, though. Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org