From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: 'Laura Abbott' <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@arndb.de>,
'Joerg Roedel' <joro@8bytes.org>,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>,
'Russell King - ARM Linux' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
'Chunsang Jeong' <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: initial proof-of-concept IOMMU mapper for DMA-mapping
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:50:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001f01cc786d$d55222c0$7ff66840$%szyprowski@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <594816116217195c28de13accaf1f9f2.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Hello,
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 6:42 PM Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi, a few comments
> On Fri, September 2, 2011 6:56 am, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> ...
> > +
> > +struct dma_iommu_mapping {
> > + /* iommu specific data */
> > + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> > +
> > + void *bitmap;
>
> In the earlier version of this patch you had this as a genpool instead of
> just doing the bitmaps manually. Is there a reason genpool can't be used
> to get the iova addresses?
IMHO genpool was a bit overkill in this case and required some additional
patches for aligned allocations. In the next version I also want to extend
this bitmap based allocator to dynamically resize the bitmap for more than
one page if the io address space gets exhausted.
> > + size_t bits;
> > + unsigned int order;
> > + dma_addr_t base;
> > +
> > + struct mutex lock;
> > +};
> <snip>
> > +int arm_iommu_attach_device(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t base, size_t
> > size, int order)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int count = (size >> PAGE_SHIFT) - order;
> > + unsigned int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(count) * sizeof(long);
> > + struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping;
> > + int err = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + mapping = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dma_iommu_mapping), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!mapping)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + mapping->bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!mapping->bitmap)
> > + goto err2;
> > +
> > + mapping->base = base;
> > + mapping->bits = bitmap_size;
> > + mapping->order = order;
> > + mutex_init(&mapping->lock);
> > +
> > + mapping->domain = iommu_domain_alloc();
> > + if (!mapping->domain)
> > + goto err3;
> > +
> > + err = iommu_attach_device(mapping->domain, dev);
> > + if (err != 0)
> > + goto err4;
> > +
> > + dev->archdata.mapping = mapping;
> > + set_dma_ops(dev, &iommu_ops);
> > +
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "Attached IOMMU controller to %s device.\n",
> > dev_name(dev));
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err4:
> > + iommu_domain_free(mapping->domain);
> > +err3:
> > + kfree(mapping->bitmap);
> > +err2:
> > + kfree(mapping);
> > +err:
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
> > +
> > +#endif
> Attach makes the assumption that each iommu device will exist in a
> separate domain. What if multiple devices want to use the same iommu
> domain? The msm iommu implementation has many different iommu devices but
> many of these will need the same buffer to be mapped in each context so
> currently many devices share the same domain. Without this, the same map
> call would need to happen for each device, which creates extra map calls
> and overhead.
Ah, right. I forgot about the case when devices need to share one domain.
Moving iommu_domain_alloc out of arm_iommu_attach_device and giving that
function just a pointer to the iommu domain should solve this issue. I will
change this in the next version of the patches.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-02 13:56 [RFC 0/2 v2] ARM: DMA-mapping & IOMMU integration Marek Szyprowski
2011-09-02 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: initial proof-of-concept IOMMU mapper for DMA-mapping Marek Szyprowski
2011-09-08 16:41 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Laura Abbott
2011-09-08 16:41 ` Laura Abbott
2011-09-21 14:50 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2011-10-10 21:56 ` Krishna Reddy
2011-10-11 8:19 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-11 8:19 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-11 18:13 ` Krishna Reddy
2011-10-12 1:34 ` Krishna Reddy
2011-10-12 5:49 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-12 7:02 ` Krishna Reddy
2011-10-13 0:18 ` Krishna Reddy
2011-10-17 14:07 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-09-02 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Samsung: update/rewrite Samsung SYSMMU (IOMMU) driver Marek Szyprowski
2011-09-05 18:21 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-06 10:27 ` KyongHo Cho
2011-09-06 10:27 ` KyongHo Cho
2011-09-06 12:35 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-09-06 12:35 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001f01cc786d$d55222c0$7ff66840$%szyprowski@samsung.com' \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=andrzej.p@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chunsang.jeong@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).