From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Pulling the rest of the User-API header split patches Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:50:02 +0000 Message-ID: <10234.1326729002@redhat.com> References: <19981.1325887323@redhat.com> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58261 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755203Ab2APPuS (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:50:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <19981.1325887323@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, airlied@redhat.com Hi Linus, Thanks for pulling the User-API header split preliminary patches. Will you be pulling the rest of the patches to actually perform the split at the end of this merge window? If so, as previously mentioned, I'll need to regenerate them before you do. However, for the moment, I dropped the preliminary patches from my tree and regenerated the rest based on the tree I saw this morning: http://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git/shortlog/refs/heads/uapi-split I've made 'make allyesconfig' build again on x86_64. arch/x86/lib/insn.c is compiled for use in both userspace and kernelspace, necessitating a bit of #include adjustment, but that was the only necessary change. I've also had Dave Airlie review the preparatory DRM patches and those have been adjusted. An opinion, if I may: I have been checking the scripts into the GIT tree (with the intention to delete them later) so that a record of them is retained - but I wonder if I should bother... Hopefully, once the scripts are run and the results applied, it won't be necessary to retain the scripts. Thanks, David