Re:

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

[bummer, reply-to-all broken]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 16:41,  <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> Subject: [RFC 06/17] asm-generic: add a complete signal.h

> There used to be an asm-generic/signal.h, but not one that
> could be used out of the box. This renames the existing file
> to asm-generic/signal-defs.h and adds a new asm-generic/signal.h

The rename was done in another patch, but you forgot to update this
patch description?

> with common definitions for sigaction and sigaltstack, but
> not for the old-style signal handlers.
>
> New architectures should only implement rt-signals and use this
> generic header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@googlemail.com>
> ---
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/Kbuild   |    1    1 +     0 -     0 !
>  include/asm-generic/signal.h |  131    131 +   0 -     0 !

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds