linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: sys_recvmmsg: wire up or not?
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:39:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10f740e80912260239n17bbbd08w6c3065c12bde9c95@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

On m68k, I get:

<stdin>:1523:2: warning: #warning syscall recvmmsg not implemented

so I started to wire up sys_recvmmsg.
Then I noticed it's already accessible, through sys_socketcall, as m68k defines
__ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL. So I guess this is a false positive?

Surprisingly, several architectures have both defined __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL
and wired up sys_recvmmsg. Is this intentional?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-26 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-26 10:39 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2009-12-26 11:12 ` sys_recvmmsg: wire up or not? Arnd Bergmann
2010-01-14  4:20   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-14  4:20     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-14  4:28     ` David Miller
2010-01-14  6:59       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-14  9:33         ` Russell King
2010-01-15  3:32           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-19  7:21         ` Paul Mundt
2010-01-19  7:21           ` Paul Mundt
2010-01-19 23:14           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10f740e80912260239n17bbbd08w6c3065c12bde9c95@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).