From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation From: Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <14242.1134558772@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <13820.1134558138@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20051213143147.d2a57fb3.pj@sgi.com> <20051213094053.33284360.pj@sgi.com> <20051212161944.3185a3f9.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213075441.GB6765@elte.hu> <20051213090219.GA27857@infradead.org> <20051213093949.GC26097@elte.hu> <20051213100015.GA32194@elte.hu> <6281.1134498864@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <14242.1134558772@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:18:41 +0000 Message-Id: <1134559121.25663.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 To: David Howells Cc: Paul Jackson , mingo@elte.hu, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, arjan@infradead.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mer, 2005-12-14 at 11:12 +0000, David Howells wrote: > David Howells wrote: > > > > > (6) Make wrappers for up/down that map to counting semaphores with the > > deprecation attribute set. > > (7) After a couple of months, remove up and down entirely. Why bother. As has already been discussed up and down are the natural and normal names for counting semaphores. You don't need to obsolete the old API thats just silly, you need to add a new one and wait for people to use it. The old API is still very useful for some applications that want counting semaphores.