From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, geert@linux-m68k.org,
Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk, chrisw@sous-sol.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [patch] s390 kconfig cleanup, 2nd version.
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:35:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1151922910.5334.10.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060703022026.495cdb2c.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 02:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > That would be a very useful feature to have. There are some border cases
> > where no real positive dependency exist. For that a "disable xxx" would
> > be perfect. But we still should use positive dependencies where possible
> > to keep the disable lists short.
> >
>
> I don't understand that.
>
> depends on !DISABLE_FOO
>
> is short?
I was after the options that can be dealt with an existing positive
dependency, e.g. "depends on PCI", or "depends on ISA". I have a handful
of these in my patch.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-03 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-30 12:26 [patch] s390 kconfig cleanup, 2nd version Martin Schwidefsky
2006-06-30 12:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-06-30 12:54 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-06-30 12:44 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 13:04 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-06-30 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-06-30 13:28 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-06-30 14:05 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 14:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-06-30 14:20 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-07-03 23:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-03 23:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-04 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-04 13:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-07-04 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-04 18:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-01 2:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-30 14:13 ` Kyle McMartin
2006-06-30 14:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 17:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-30 18:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-03 9:10 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-07-03 9:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 10:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2006-07-07 16:19 ` [Kconfig] add disable command (was Re: [patch] s390 kconfig cleanup, 2nd version) Martin Schwidefsky
2006-07-07 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-07 16:19 ` [Kconfig] use " Martin Schwidefsky
2006-07-07 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-08 23:42 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1151922910.5334.10.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox