From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:48861 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932084AbWIJKwD (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:52:03 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2 From: Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <1157885180.2977.133.camel@pmac.infradead.org> References: <1157472883.9018.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1157885180.2977.133.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:15:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1157886908.22571.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 11:46 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse: > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 17:14 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > + > > +#define TCGETS2 _IOR('T',0x2A, struct termios) > > +#define TCSETS2 _IOW('T',0x2B, struct termios) > > +#define TCSETSW2 _IOW('T',0x2C, struct termios) > > +#define TCSETSF2 _IOW('T',0x2D, struct termios) > > So existing code compiled against this will be using the new 'struct > termios' but the old TCGETS. Should we rename the existing ioctl to > TCGETS_OLD, and have TCGETS be the new one? Kernel headers are not intended for user space. In this case the struct termios presented by glibc already differs from the termios presented by the kernel so the problem doesn't arise at all. Alan