From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:62173 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbWIJMB2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:01:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2 From: Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <1157887240.2977.147.camel@pmac.infradead.org> References: <1157472883.9018.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1157885180.2977.133.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1157886908.22571.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1157887240.2977.147.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:24:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1157891081.23085.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 12:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse: > But I don't think it's realistic to suggest that C libraries should be > built without access to our asm/term{bit,io}s.h at all. However, I'm > only really responsible for the new export _mechanism_ -- I'm not going > to impose policy except when people like Andi do stupid things and > sneakily send private patches to undo fixes I've already made. glibc needs them, nobody else does. The point I was trying to make is that user space (except glibc) does not use them. glibc presents a different struct termios to them already, and it always includes c_ispeed/c_ospeed. Alan