From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>, bernd.schmidt@analog.com
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin arch: add some missing syscall
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:57:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189673849.30686.28.camel@roc-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0709130137l55977c28w95cf8527ae8b9e24@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/13/07, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > +/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
> >
> > I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
> > of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
> > embedded platform? not the kind which runs applications that use mbind),
>
> sorry, i dont quite follow ... you're saying it does or doesnt make
> sense to have NUMA syscalls on a no-mmu platform ? my [limited]
> understanding of NUMA is that it, by definition, requires a MMU in
> order to shunt pages around
>
I think Matt means mbind can be ignored because it is for NUMA.
> > but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> > to be implemented for no-mmu?
>
> you're right we want mremap, my fault
>
Yes, I do think so, both sys_mremap and sys_munmap are implemented in
mm/nommu.c. How do think of this, Bernd?
> > I think you'll want the *robust_list syscalls too.
>
> lack of man pages on these made be lazy and dump em into the mmu pile
> when in reality they have nothing to do with it ... we do want these
>
No man pages for this fancy syscalls. I found some info here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e9056f13bfcdd054a0c3d730e4e096748d8a363a
I am not sure for these. Need some investigation.
> > > +#define __IGNORE_swapon
> > > +#define __IGNORE_swapoff
>
> a no brainer -- not usable on no-mmu
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_msync
> > > +#define __IGNORE_remap_file_pages
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mlock
> > > +#define __IGNORE_munlock
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mlockall
> > > +#define __IGNORE_munlockall
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mincore
> > > +#define __IGNORE_madvise
>
> implementation only exists for mmu
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mbind
> > > +#define __IGNORE_get_mempolicy
> > > +#define __IGNORE_set_mempolicy
> > > +#define __IGNORE_migrate_pages
> > > +#define __IGNORE_move_pages
>
> NUMA only
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_mremap
> > > +#define __IGNORE_set_robust_list
> > > +#define __IGNORE_get_robust_list
>
> we want these
>
> > > +#define __IGNORE_getcpu
>
> useful only with SMP so i guess we should do it
also the brand new syscall fallocate should be added as Paul said:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=97ac73506c0ba93f30239bb57b4cfc5d73e68a62
Thanks a lot
-Bryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-13 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-13 7:56 [PATCH] Blackfin arch: add some missing syscall Bryan Wu
2007-09-13 8:07 ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-13 8:09 ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-13 8:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-09-13 8:37 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-09-13 8:57 ` Bryan Wu [this message]
2007-09-13 11:03 ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-14 5:45 ` Bryan Wu
2007-09-14 6:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-09-14 7:32 ` Bryan Wu
2007-09-15 1:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-09-13 8:47 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1189673849.30686.28.camel@roc-desktop \
--to=bryan.wu@analog.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bernd.schmidt@analog.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).