Re: [PATCH 14/17] UAPI: Make linux/patchkey.h easier to parse

David Howells
2011-12-13T13:58:19Z

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Is this part missing, or no longer needed?
>
> It seems to have got lost somewhere. Thanks for catching it.

Actually, it doesn't seem to be necessary. The header splitter managed to cope
without it and did the right thing. I think what happened was that the
splitter didn't recognise the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H_INDIRECT thing as a reinclusion
guard, so it just tossed that into the UAPI header, then recognised the
_LINUX_PATCHKEY_H thing as the reinclusion guard and proceeded from there.

Would you prefer that I remove that from the comments or would you prefer that
I leave things unchanged?

David