public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] kernel: move arches that use the generic_le/be helpers
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:43:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207860182.22001.40.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410203708.GA28014-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 21:37 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:44:08PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> 
> Btw, you may want to look at the current MIPS implementation of
> get_unaligned and put_unaligned.  It's pure C and at least on MIPS it
> produces somewhat shorter code and the source is definately much
> shorter since it exploits the compiler's cleverness.
> 
>   Ralf

Yeah, the only reason I did not is that many arches intentionally bug
during the linking process when the argument size is not 1,2,4,8 whereas
some do not...it would be nice to get a decision on what is the right
answer.

Also, I saw the mips version, what would you think of moving to the
no_builtin_memcpy version from my patchset...or just look at
h3800, xtensa, or m32r arch implementations currently in tree.

Cheers,

Harvey

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] kernel: move arches that use the generic_le/be helpers
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:43:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207860182.22001.40.camel@brick> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080410204302.q72lW7EVaLEuQEp08qYaNHP98Jw8TCk9mVINrriiY24@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410203708.GA28014@linux-mips.org>

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 21:37 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:44:08PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> 
> Btw, you may want to look at the current MIPS implementation of
> get_unaligned and put_unaligned.  It's pure C and at least on MIPS it
> produces somewhat shorter code and the source is definately much
> shorter since it exploits the compiler's cleverness.
> 
>   Ralf

Yeah, the only reason I did not is that many arches intentionally bug
during the linking process when the argument size is not 1,2,4,8 whereas
some do not...it would be nice to get a decision on what is the right
answer.

Also, I saw the mips version, what would you think of moving to the
no_builtin_memcpy version from my patchset...or just look at
h3800, xtensa, or m32r arch implementations currently in tree.

Cheers,

Harvey


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-10 19:44 [PATCH 4/8] kernel: move arches that use the generic_le/be helpers Harvey Harrison
2008-04-10 19:44 ` Harvey Harrison
     [not found] ` <20080410203708.GA28014@linux-mips.org>
     [not found]   ` <20080410203708.GA28014-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-10 20:43     ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-04-10 20:43       ` Harvey Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1207860182.22001.40.camel@brick \
    --to=harvey.harrison-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox