From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch] generic IPI: simplify barriers and locking Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:32:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1235561557.4645.3247.camel@laptop> References: <20090225052244.GB22785@wotan.suse.de> <20090225112800.GG15453@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:57844 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756750AbZBYLda (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:33:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090225112800.GG15453@elte.hu> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jens Axboe , Oleg Nesterov , Suresh Siddha , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 12:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Nick Piggin wrote: > > > OK, shall we go ahead with this? Only objection from arch guys > > came from x86, which has since fixed up ordering of IPIs > > versus memory operations. > > > > It simplifies things quite a bit and I think Peter is using it > > as a base under his remove kmalloc patchset.. > > Sure. I had Peter's patches in tip/core/ipi but they had test > failures so it's still being worked out. You never had these latest few I think. Let me repost them.