From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
oleg@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, tony.luck@intel.com,
rth@twiddle.net, geert@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:51:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247241066.7529.50.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17047.1247240546@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 11:42 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:57:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra said:
>
> > +/*
> > + * Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
> > + * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
> > + */
> > +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT (1)
> > +
>
> I had to look at this for quite some time before it sank in that it wasn't
> a reset of a #define, or a reset of (1) (anybody else remember changing the
> value of '5' in a Fortran program?). Especially when stuck in with a bunch
> of cputimer defines. Would have taken even longer if I was looking in sched.h
> for something and not looking at this patch at the same time.
>
> Can we fix this comment to mention it's thread_info.preempt_count that
> needs the reset?
Something along the lines of the below?
---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -502,7 +502,9 @@ struct task_cputime {
/*
* Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
- * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
+ *
+ * We reset this initial offset of init_thread_info.preempt_count in:
+ * start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
*/
#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT (1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-10 12:57 [PATCH 0/2] cond_resched() optimization Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 15:42 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-07-10 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-10 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 20:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-07-10 21:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-07-11 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-11 10:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-07-10 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: optimize cond_resched() Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 17:12 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-10 22:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] cond_resched() optimization Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-11 11:28 ` -tip: ACPICA: Do not schedule during early init Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247241066.7529.50.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).