From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:36:17 +1000 Message-ID: <1247708177.9851.4.camel@concordia> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3sW64rSI2yIG/UuMyqDm" Return-path: Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.25]:36707 "EHLO bilbo.ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756887AbZGPBgT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:36:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Linux Memory Management , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins --=-3sW64rSI2yIG/UuMyqDm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 17:49 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Upcoming paches to support the new 64-bit "BookE" powerpc architecture > will need to have the virtual address corresponding to PTE page when > freeing it, due to the way the HW table walker works. > I haven't had a chance to test or even build on most architectures, the > patch is reasonably trivial but I may have screwed up regardless, I > appologize in advance, let me know if something is wrong. Builds for the important architectures, powerpc, ia64, arm, sparc, sparc64, oh and x86: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1976/ (based on your test branch 34f25476) cheers --=-3sW64rSI2yIG/UuMyqDm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkpehAQACgkQdSjSd0sB4dIe4QCgsEWUeUUCjt33SGp2XpLqD/1W /QsAn37UyeAeK5Msl22yj/kzj0VYowyT =Lbt0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3sW64rSI2yIG/UuMyqDm--