From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:40:42 +0200 Message-ID: <12538756.JybTPMqFHj@wuerfel> References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <13000968.l0laEvMsix@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ley Foon Tan Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 September 2014 18:18:50 Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:20:08 LF.Tan wrote: > >> Hi Arnd > >> > >> Are you okay with this generic futex in asm-generic? > >> > > > > Yes, this looks good. Remind me again who need this, would it make > > sense to merge this through an architecture-specific tree for > > whichever architecture can benefit from it? > What is the common practice for this? > Do you mean merge with nios2 or other arch, eg m68k? I mean do it as part of the nios2 patches. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:64486 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184AbaIXKku (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:40:50 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:40:42 +0200 Message-ID: <12538756.JybTPMqFHj@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: References: <1410168160-3624-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <13000968.l0laEvMsix@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ley Foon Tan Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang Message-ID: <20140924104042.IhwQKjok2bX4A0R7opdxFbHqMqJ8Z3R3vSvWLbSmAa0@z> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 18:18:50 Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:20:08 LF.Tan wrote: > >> Hi Arnd > >> > >> Are you okay with this generic futex in asm-generic? > >> > > > > Yes, this looks good. Remind me again who need this, would it make > > sense to merge this through an architecture-specific tree for > > whichever architecture can benefit from it? > What is the common practice for this? > Do you mean merge with nios2 or other arch, eg m68k? I mean do it as part of the nios2 patches. Arnd