From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
tytso@mit.edu, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hch@infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git patches] xfs and block fixes for virtually indexed arches
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1261094220.2752.27.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091217193648.GI4489@kernel.dk>
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 20:36 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > Sure, but there's some rumors/oral traditions going around that some
> > > block devices want bio address which are page aligned, because they
> > > want to play some kind of refcounting game,
> >
> > Yeah, you might be right at that.
> >
> > > And it's Weird Shit(tm) (aka iSCSI, AoE) type drivers, that most of us
> > > don't have access to, so just because it works Just Fine on SATA doesn't
> > > mean anything.
> > >
> > > And none of this is documented anywhere, which is frustrating as hell.
> > > Just rumors that "if you do this, AoE/iSCSI will corrupt your file
> > > systems".
> >
> > ACK. Jens?
>
> I've heard those rumours too, and I don't even know if they are true.
> Who has a pointer to such a bug report and/or issue? The block layer
> itself doesn't not have any such requirements, and the only places where
> we play page games is for bio's that were explicitly mapped with pages
> by itself (like mapping user data).o
OK, so what happened is that prior to the map single fix
commit df46b9a44ceb5af2ea2351ce8e28ae7bd840b00f
Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon Jun 20 14:04:44 2005 +0200
[PATCH] Add blk_rq_map_kern()
bio could only accept user space buffers, so we had a special path for
kernel allocated buffers. That commit unified the path (with a separate
block API) so we could now submit kmalloc'd buffers via block APIs.
So the rule now is we can accept any user mapped area via
blk_rq_map_user and any kmalloc'd area via blk_rq_map_kern(). We might
not be able to do a stack area (depending on how the arch maps the
stack) and we definitely cannot do a vmalloc'd area.
So it sounds like we only need a blk_rq_map_vmalloc() using the same
techniques as the patch set and we're good to go.
> We fix driver crap like that, we don't work around it. It's a BUG.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091216043618.GB9104@hera.kernel.org>
2009-12-17 13:22 ` [git patches] xfs and block fixes for virtually indexed arches Kyle McMartin
2009-12-17 13:22 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-12-17 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:30 ` tytso
2009-12-17 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 18:08 ` Russell King
2009-12-17 18:08 ` Russell King
2009-12-17 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-19 18:33 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-12-19 18:33 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-12-21 17:14 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-17 17:39 ` tytso
2009-12-17 17:39 ` tytso
2009-12-17 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 19:36 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-17 19:36 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-17 23:57 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-12-17 23:57 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-18 1:00 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-18 2:44 ` Dave Chinner
2009-12-18 2:44 ` Dave Chinner
2009-12-18 3:51 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-18 3:51 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-18 7:10 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-18 7:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-18 9:34 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-18 10:01 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-18 10:01 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-18 10:24 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-18 10:30 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-18 12:00 ` Dave Chinner
2009-12-18 12:00 ` Dave Chinner
2009-12-18 0:21 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-18 14:17 ` tytso
2009-12-18 14:17 ` tytso
2009-12-21 8:53 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-17 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-17 17:33 ` tytso
2009-12-17 17:33 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1261094220.2752.27.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).